Month: April 2018

Posted on

The Controversy Of Gayness

I was at a church community group meeting last night when one of the participants began to tell us about a conflict going on amongst the governing bodies of the Reformed Church of America.  Quick background: Each church in the RCA belongs to a larger governing body called a classis whose job it is to help guide member churches on theology, church governance, dealing with the social issues of the day, etc. – at least that’s my basic understanding of it.

Anyway, two of these particular classis(s?) are apparently now engaged in a heated argument over how to “handle” the “gay issue”.  I’ve been hearing the same argument for four years now.  The Far West Classis (or something like that) doesn’t want gays in the churches or in leadership or getting married – some kind of exclusion – while the Rocky Mountain Classis (or something like that) thinks gays are just fine.  That’s the gist of it at least, but the one thing I do know for sure is that people are spending a lot of time, energy, and money (that they don’t have) on this.  Which leads me to one simple question:

Why?

Shouldn’t we be feeding hungry people? Sheltering refugees? Or maybe getting involved in stopping something that actually harms (kills) people, like mass shootings?

By the way, my aim is to stay non-partisan in this blog so I’m mentioning mass shootings for one reason and one reason only here: people are dying, often children, yet nothing, absolutely nothing, is being done about it.  Isn’t that staggering? I don’t care what the solution is – gun control, mental health, further background checks, whatever –  we just need to do something about mass shootings, all politics aside.

But back to the topic of this post.  I cannot for the life of me understand why people spend so much time and energy on something that is not affecting anyone negatively, at least not in any real way.  You are born gay and we all know that.  God makes all people, so he made “them” gay.  Sure God makes murderers too but those people do real harm and should be punished.  That’s obvious to anyone being objective.

How has a gay person ever harmed anyone? Wait, let me put that more clearly: how has gayness ever harmed anyone?

Of course there are some horrible people – thieves, murderers, kidnappers – who happen to be gay and they should be punished accordingly, but it wasn’t their gayness that did the harm.  Their sexuality had nothing to do with it.

Quick story to illustrate this point: I had a conversation with a relative who considers herself evangelical and I asked her basically this same thing.  She gave me the following example: “What if your daughter had a gay teacher who presented the “gay lifestyle” as an option to your 10 year-old? Like this teacher suggested sexual situations to her, situations that gay people participate in?”

Needless to say, I was stunned.  If that same teacher was 100% heterosexual and suggested 100% heterosexual situations to my 10 year-old my reaction would be no different than with the gay teacher: fire him/her right now.  The teacher’s sexuality had absolutely nothing to do with it whatsoever and I was shocked (and enlightened) to learn that my relative could not separate the immoral, the bad, from the gayness.  Gayness does not harm; immorality does.

So given that fact – yes, fact – why do we spend so much time, energy, and money fighting against something that isn’t doing any real harm to anyone? Is it because it’s “in the bible”?

I’ve heard that one a lot.  I’m not sure where that passage is – it’s definitely not one of the Ten Commandments – but I typically hear people cite the bible as the reason they are against gays.  (Incidentally, you know what one of the commandments is? Love thy neighbor…but only if he’s not gay…?)

So just for argument’s sake, let’s say it is in the bible, clear as day, right in one of those popular books:  Gayness is immoral.  In big bold letters.

Is that really how anyone judges right and wrong? When you first heard of someone murdering someone did you have to consult the bible first to know it was wrong or was there something inside you that just knew it? When someone stole your bike did you thumb through the good book to know if you should be pissed?

The bible has a lot of good in it but it also has a lot of contradictions, and I guarantee 99% of people have not read and understood the entire thing.  The Ten Commandments is a simple list that I could see people using as a guide, but the bible? The whole thing? It’s a massive, complex book that you need footnotes or a theologian to understand.  And that footnote author or theologian often has their own agenda and interpretations…just like the people who wrote it.

The bible was not written by God – it was inspired by God – but our morality, our soul did come from God.  I believe that he creates that.  In my opinion, when we look inside ourselves to judge right or wrong, when we consult our morality and just know that sexual abuse (for example) is wrong, it’s not from some book – it’s from our soul.  I am positive that a newborn baby could witness a murder and just know that it’s wrong.  No one would have to tell them – they would just feel it.

So, do all these people who want gay people to just stop being gay and want to banish them from their communities just feel it inside- as in truly despising the entirety of that gay person – and merely use the bible as an excuse? My guess is that their imaginations jump to the sexual acts that gays engage in and that is what disgusts them and then they use the bible as the moral compass for that disgust.  OK, fair enough – gay sexual acts disgust you.  But I’ll tell you this – it disgusts me to think about anyone having any kind of sex.  Picture your parents having sex – disgusting ? Of course.  Do you hate them for it? Why jump to this thing – sexual acts – that comprises probably 1% of a person’s life and use that as your judgement of them? We don’t love everything about about anyone in this world.  Sexual orientation is a very arbitrary criteria for moral soundness.

And as far as using the bible for that criteria, imagine someone shows up one day and says “hey wait, biblical scholars just figured out that the part in the bible that says gays are bad was actually added in the 1700s by some English king  – it’s a bogus passage”.  Would all the people who despise gays change their minds overnight? Snap! Oh, OK, gays are all right after all! Nice! I can start loving my neighbor now!

Or another example: I know guns were not invented in the era of the bible, but let’s say they were and someone discovered a new book by Saint John that said we shouldn’t have guns – would people just throw them away because “it’s in the bible?” Does that book really define their morality?

I doubt it.  I think it can be a fine guide (I think the stuff about idols and loving your neighbor are words to live by) but a word-for-word guide to life?

Often times we find many of the same people who live by the bible also live by this other text created a couple millennia later: the United States Constitution; another fine document with some great ideas, but also not without contradictions.  Like, for example, the 18th and 21st amendments.

18th: booze is bad!

21st: no, we had it wrong, booze is great!

We see a lot of people cite the 2nd amendment to justify their use, love, and defense of guns.  “It’s my right, this weapon is my right, it’s in the constitution”.  Tell me, how did they work around the 18th and 21st amendments when it came to alcohol? From 1919 to 1933 the 18th amendment banned all booze from being bought, sold, or consumed in the United States, and I guarantee you there were large groups of people pointing to that amendment to justify their conviction that drinking a beer was immoral.

So what was their argument then on December 5, 1933 when the 21st amendment passed? Were they suddenly OK with your six-pack of IPA?

Governments are different entities than saints, I get that.  Governments write laws (constitutions) while saints (mostly) wrote the bible, so with a lot of people the bible and constitution carry different weight, but by listening to the 2nd amendment folks there isn’t much weight difference.

But those documents and texts are not truly the point here.  I believe the bible and the constitution are treated much like our news channels are nowadays – you find the one that supports your sense of morality, your sense of rights and wrongs, and you justify your beliefs with it.

Those staunch defenders of the constitution who always cite the 2nd amendment? Many of those same people support politicians who seek to ban the 14th amendment (if you are born here, regardless of your parents’ status, you are an American).

If the constitution is your gold standard you have to defend it all.  No exceptions.  You can’t use it to justify your morality on some issues but not on others.  You just can’t.  That’s called hypocrisy.

Again, giving them the benefit of the doubt that the bible tells you not to be gay (I don’t believe it does but I’ll give them this), how about the couple commandments I cited earlier? Are they adhering to those? The commandments are definitely in the bible and I guarantee a lot of those anti-gay folks do not automatically love their neighbors.  I guarantee they have on occasion made idols of things other than God…like cars, wealth, status, etc.  Guaranteed.

We’re all hypocrites in the end.  I’m a hypocrite.  You’re a hypocrite.  Democrats are hypocrites.  Republicans are hypocrites.  All humans are hypocrites.  Why, you will often catch me eating a piece of chocolate cake and drinking a…..diet coke!

Hypocrite.  Are you really watching your calories, Mike?

When people see me they may chuckle to themselves and take note of the hypocrisy but it certainly won’t bother them.  It doesn’t hurt them.  A reasonable person won’t spend any time thinking about it.  They may notice it briefly, and then get on to the more important things in their day.  Maybe they’ll get back to their productive job, maybe teach somebody something useful.  Maybe they’ll get in their car and drive off to see an ailing neighbor.  Maybe they’ll arrive at the construction site where they are helping a group of people build a house for someone.  Maybe they’ll just go home and spend time with their families.  They certainly have much more important things to do than get spun up about my behavior.

They won’t spend any time on the thing I’m doing – even though they may not agree with it – because it does not actually affect them, not in any way.  They don’t need to read a line in a book to tell them that my drinking a diet beverage and eating a fattening cake is harmless- they just simply know it.  So, most likely, they merely notice the behavior, shrug their shoulders, and then get on their way, to the actual important, productive things in life…

…you know, like the Reformed Church Of America should start doing.

Posted on

Seize The Moment

I’ve been thinking a lot about contentedness recently.  There are myriad slogans and catch-phrases that address it, such as ‘money can’t buy happiness’, ‘seize the day’, ‘first-world problems’, ‘do what you love and you’ll never work a day in your life’, etc., but it can’t really be explained away that easily.  Contentedness is a lot more nuanced that that.

Economically, I’ve been at both ends of the spectrum at various points in my life.  Not flat-broke or uber-rich but certainly lower (lower, lower) middle class and probably what most would consider upper class, although I don’t like applying that label to myself, so let’s call it ‘pretty well-off’.  Either way, I’ve been equally miserable and equally joyous at times in those different economic states.  When I think back to my life, I don’t really remember my overall emotional state related to my economic state as much as I do some memorable moments during those times.  Example – I met my future wife when I barely had a dime to my name.  That was great.  But conversely I also suffered great embarrassment when I once received a notification that my bank account was overdrawn by 16 cents and I had to scrounge up 17 cents in pennies and nickels from a desk drawer to get my account back in the black.

On the other end of that spectrum, becoming a home owner certainly qualifies as a highlight of being well-off.  But the Yang to that Yin are the deep frustrations I’ve felt at the very job that puts me into that economic category.

I’ve found myself complaining no matter how much money I have, which brings me to one of my favorite phrases: First World Problems.  Whenever I find myself complaining about the short life of my iPhone battery, I just mumble that golden phrase someone certainly invented to shame us for even thinking about complaining.  There are kids starving in Yemen, Mike.  Good God man, get some perspective.

These phrases may help us feel thankful and content for a short time but we always return to the norm.  Things irritate us no matter how good we have it.

‘Money can’t buy happiness’ is one of the most famous phrases of all.  It’s proven true immediately by simply observing rich people.  Do they have any problems? Absolutely.  In fact many of their problems are exactly the same as those faced by everyone else: poor health, bad relationships, feelings of incompetence, poor career choices, loneliness, etc.  All the cash in the world won’t help you if you are genetically sickly.  A fat wallet is meaningless if you can’t relate to other people.  A large bank account will not raise your low self-esteem.

Do rich people have fewer problems? Biggie Smalls says ‘no’ emphatically in ‘Mo’ Money, Mo’ Problems.’  Maybe not more problems, B.I.G., but you definitely had different problems than a lot of us; very few of us will ever get shot at multiple times in our lives…the last time fatally.  Yikes.

Do poor people have more problems? Probably, at least in some aspects of life.  Health care would be one of them.  Access to good education certainly another.  In one of those ‘you-have-no-right-to-complain’ moments in my life I observed a family living in a landfill in a shack made out of garbage outside Guatemala City – and they were smiling and laughing.  No one would trade places with them but they were certainly not miserable, at least not in that moment.

How about people who turn their hobby into their full-time job? Paid to sky-dive, paid to eat, paid to see movies, paid to travel the world.  The people who magically figure out some way to turn the things they’d happily do for free into steady paychecks as opposed to those of us slogging away at a computer inside a gray cubicle housed in some run-down building in a strip-mall alongside the interstate, working interminably at these meaningless tasks that add no value to our lives other than feeding our bank accounts? Those people are happier than us, right? Maybe, but I believe the moment you have to do something to earn that paycheck then it becomes work.  I have a friend who complained forever that corporate america sucked and he just wanted to work for a brewery.  He eventually landed the brewing job and guess what? Do I even have to say? Yeah, you guessed it – he’s as miserable as ever…his complaints are just different.

Hell, I even got bored and frustrated on my trip around-the-world.  Let me describe my life for those 2.5 years: no work, just exploring the different town, region, or city I woke up in that day.  Ate whenever, never set an alarm clock, went wherever I felt like going.  Drank at 10 in the morning if wanted to.  No concerns about money because I had socked it away for several years.  Basically every day was Saturday in some exotic location.  It was amazing, but of course I still had problems: Thieves.  Loneliness.  Sickness (mostly food related).  Boredom.  Lack of a goal.  Feeling unfulfilled.

Yep, lots of problems, and that was my dream trip!

When I think back on it though I rarely remember the bad parts; I remember rather the great moments.  Seeing the Great Wall of China for the first time from the train window.  Walking down the street to Red Square in Moscow, knowing that when I turned to the left I’d be staring at the iconic, colorful St. Peter’s Basilica.  Mountain biking down a mountain in Ecuador.  Seeing the ocean floor while descending down a rope-line on my first scuba diving expedition in Thailand.  Climbing up to the Sun Gate and gazing down at the ruins of Machu Picchu as the clouds cleared from the jungle in Peru.  Even the bad times, the bad moments, have become some of my funniest stories to tell around the campfire, several of which will eventually appear in this blog.

So as I mull over my lifelong pursuit of contentedness I reflect on all these different points in my life and the circumstances within them, trying to decipher when I was most content.  I suppose I have never been truly content.  I am beginning to think I never will.

What does it mean to be content anyway? Does that mean you never make a change again? That you stay in the same place, with the same people, and do the same things for the rest of your life? You just find this happy balance and stay there? Well, that couldn’t work because the people, places, and things will change around you – they will force change upon you.  Some of your relationships will end, your health will decline, your neighborhood will change, your job will get worse, unexpected expenses will pop up.  Change gonna come, Sam Cooke, whether you like it or not.

And besides, that lack of movement, the disinterest in pursuing change, of simply remaining as you are stinks of laziness to me.  Ambition is a good thing, right? Improvement? That’s something we admire in people usually.  If you are discontent, make a change.

Given all of this, contentedness seems impossible…can it even happen?

Perhaps it can for some people.  Really, really adaptable people maybe.  People who just plod along and roll with the punches, unaffected by the changing landscape around them.  Maybe simple people too, those with few worries or desires.  Gandhi seemed pretty content, no?

But how about for the rest of us? I don’t think most of us are really, really adaptable or enlightened Gods of Hinduism – how do we find contentedness?

It seems to me that the answer is to change our expectations.  We think – or at least I do – of contentedness as a long-term state, but I really think it’s more fleeting than that.  I think contentedness exists only in the moments of our lives.  Reading back over what I’ve written, I find that word popping up over and over: moments.

Maybe because for those of us who aren’t so happy-go-lucky, who may get bothered by trivial things, who continually seek out what’s next, true contentedness is a fallacy.  You find that perfect parking spot and then return to the car to find a door ding.  You eat a great meal only to later fall ill to food poisoning.  You find the perfect house and then the horrible neighbor moves in.  Each of those situations contains a moment: when you pulled into the parking spot, when you were eating the delicious meal, when you walked through the front door for the first time, a the moment when you were so content…but then it was gone, like waking from a blissful dream.  Poof.  Ugh, not this shit again.

An entire day of being content is so rare.  Almost impossible.  Seize the day! yelled Robin Williams in Dead Poet’s Society.  Make the most of it.  Good advice, but maybe that’s too much for us.  A day is too big usually.  Maybe we need to focus a bit more on the building blocks of those great days, those tiny slices of time where the experience is just what you want and perfect and amazing and just right and “oh why can’t I bottle this?!”

How many great days have you had? OK, OK, now how many great moments? Ahh, there we go…you’ve had a whole lot of those.  Maybe if you stitched them all together they’d be enough for a lifetime…a lifetime of contentedness.  Maybe…maybe.  I’m going to work on that and get back to you…I will take those smaller snippets of time in my day, the moments, and I’ll seek the joy in there, bask in the glow of them, find the satisfaction in them…

I will Seize The Moment.

Posted on

My Father Died Today

April 16, 1988.  30 years ago today.

My mom and I were trying to buy plane tickets at Detroit Metro Airport when the woman at the ticket counter read us a message from my sister: “don’t come – it’s too late.”

We had been trying to get to California to see him one last time but, as the message said, we were too late.  We got back in the car and drove back home instead.  I remember sitting on the deacon’s bench in our dining room about 45 minutes later just kind of staring at the clock.  It was around 6 or 6:30pm Eastern time when he passed.  I was 16 years old.  Two days later I got a postcard from him.  The front said “Wish You Were Here” and the back said “see you next week.”

That was hard to read.  A message from beyond the grave.

Given that we didn’t make it to California and that I definitely was not going to see him next week, that made our drive to the airport a few days earlier the last time I would ever see him.  I remember that drive very well for two distinct reasons: One, the fact it happened at all.  A 16 year old kid getting up at 6am to drive his dad to the airport? For some reason he asked and for some reason I said yes.

The second reason was because of what he talked about on the 30-minute ride there: he spent the entire time apologizing to me.

He apologized for his treatment of me.  Said he regretted it.  Wished he could change things.

You see, he knew he was dying.  He knew this was probably his last chance to have this conversation with me.  Two years earlier his failing liver almost took him but he somehow bounced back.  But now his liver was failing again and he knew there was no bouncing back this time.  This was it.

10 years later, in 1998, I would be having a similar conversation with my mom on her deathbed, although she wouldn’t be apologizing; she would, however be expressing the same feeling my dad was on that drive to the airport:

REGRET.

My dad’s regrets centered around what he wished he hadn’t done while my mom’s were more about what she wished she had done.  They came from different angles but they both focused on the regrets of their lives – probably my dad feeling that a bit more extremely.  My mom wished she had experienced more while my dad wished he had loved more.

Either way, in my final conversations with my parents I learned what I consider to be the most important things I have ever learned.  Their parting thoughts changed my entire approach to life.  Ever since then, I have set life-goals and pursued them with ferocity and have tried my best to be a great parent, husband, uncle, brother, son-in-law, neighbor and friend.

To date, I am doing quite well on my life-goals and my relationships are in good shape.  It’s a work in progress of course; I suck some days like we all do but at the end of the day I can look in the mirror and feel good about how I am treating other people.

30 years ago today…he died at 59, left a lot of life on the table.  What would he have done between then and now? He was a funny guy, a smart guy.  I would have loved to see what he would have invented.  What machines he would have constructed.  He was a mechanical engineer with a brain full of innovative ideas.  He had a great laugh that I would like to hear again.  I would have loved to see him play with my kids, to meet my wife, to be at my wedding…

So sad.

Anyway, reflecting on that final car ride and conversation again I think I was probably too young to have said it so I’ll say it now: apology accepted, Dad.  Thank you for teaching me the importance of behaving in a way you’ll always be proud of and of owning up to it when you don’t.

Wish you were here.

Posted on

Zero Sum Game

When I restarted my career as a software engineer six years ago, I was the first full-time member on the software development team.  The contractors that had been building the web application I was soon to be responsible for were all leaving as soon as they possibly could.  They were begrudgingly bringing me up to speed on the technology as they made their way out the door.  I frankly had no idea what I was doing in those three transitional months, especially given their minimal help, but I eventually understood the technology enough to pick up where they left off and start adding to the software.  It quickly became clear though that I’d need a lot of help to complete this giant project and get it out into our customers’ hands.  Shortly after I had become somewhat comfortable with the code, another full-time employee was due to start on the team.

And I was dreading it.  Wait, what? Why was I dreading it?

Because I felt threatened.  I was scared that he would “find me out” and “expose me.” He was going to be some programming guru that would see me for what I was: an impostor who hadn’t actually coded anything significant in the last eight years (true) and therefore didn’t know what he was doing (also true).  He would quickly discover my ineptitude and tell our boss.  I would lose my job.

Not only was I worried about him exposing me but also about the woman they hired to join us a couple months later, and the guy after her.  The three of them would surely laugh at me behind my back while Human Resources drew up my termination papers.

They weren’t my teammates; they were my competitors.

When they started I didn’t train them much and I didn’t congratulate them when they figured things out.

They were my enemy.  There to rat me out and get me fired.  That’s absolutely how I felt.

Ridiculous, eh? These people were hired to help me yet there I was trying to prevent them from helping me, because who would want to help their competitors?

I worked like that for a few months, always at my desk, paranoid, uneasy, insecure.  We got very little accomplished and I was miserable because I really needed their help to deliver the software but I wouldn’t help them help me to do that.

Then one night I had an epiphany.

I was out with some friends at a bar watching this cover band when it hit me: the band was a team.  They didn’t have four lead singers, four lead guitarists, four drummers….they had one lead singer, one guitarist, one bass player, and one drummer.  You could argue that the lead singer was more important than the bass player I suppose but was he really? A band with vocals, guitar, and drums sounds pretty good but that bass just gives the music a thicker, meatier sound.  In this band – on this team – the bass player wasn’t as noticed as the lead singer but he – and his role – was very important.  Everyone couldn’t be the front man – you needed a group of people with different skill sets playing all the different instruments to make the music.

It dawned on me right then and there that our software development team was just like that band; we couldn’t deliver software if everyone had the exact same skills – we needed a group of people with different skills sets writing all the different code to deliver our software.  Our four-person team had someone who was great at the web services, someone who was great at networks, someone who was great at the front end, and someone who was great at talking to the users about what they needed (that was me).  We were a team, just like that band.

It was OK that I didn’t posses every single computer skill because my teammates had them.  I wasn’t a wizard with our tech but I still played a vital role on the team.  Once I realized that I became a much better co-worker.  I became secure in my role and began to train people, to encourage them, to compliment their successes.

And we delivered our software…through team work.

Sure enough, we continue to deliver software today.  I am the manager of that team now and that woman who once intimidated me upon joining the company is now my employee.  She is still a better coder than I will ever be but I’m a bit better as a people-person than her; we both have leveraged our unique skill-sets to great success at the company.

And now it’s impossible to imagine getting anything done without teamwork, without the different skill sets of each teammate coming together to equal something greater than the sum of their contributions.

Being a parent is another one that requires teamwork.  My wife and I have different skills; I am the funny man, the joker, the creative one who tells stories and builds forts while she keeps our girls eating right, clean, and well-rested.  When I’m frustrated and impatient with the girls, she is kind and accommodating.  When she’s short-tempered and at her wit’s end I swoop in and save the day (well, I try at least).

Anyway, the point is that we complement each other (usually), are energetic when the other is out of gas (you know, as often as possible), and exhibit endless patience (sometimes) when the other is about to blow their stack.  We are teammates and we do a great job parenting our children (pretty much most of the time).

We see it all over the place, that a team gets so much more done than an individual every could.  In parenting, in work, in your community.

So what exactly is going on with our government? Do you see any teamwork there? Of course you don’t…and they are running the country.

Referencing my previous (controversial) post about partisanship, maybe this will make my point more clear – it’s impossible to get anything done when the people running the show just automatically oppose each other.  You may disagree with me that partisanship is the problem because you feel your side is clearly right and that all you really need is for your side to win and everything will be fine again….but how has that been working out for you over the last couple decades? When your side wins is everything just perfect? Do you become stronger, fitter, happier? Is your election day joy a lasting one?

Or does that other side sitting opposite you just start making it impossible for your side to get anything done again?

Currently the Republicans aren’t getting anything done at all.  I don’t recall a time in American politics where a Congress has done less, and that is not partisan-speak but just a hard, clear observation.  Everyone would agree on that I believe.

What if Hillary had won…would things be different? Put aside what you think of Trump and try to imagine what Congress would be doing…pretty much looks the same, doesn’t it? There would undoubtedly be some differences but we would likely not be much farther along than we are now.

And that is because our government and current political system is playing a Zero Sum Game.  It is one big pissing contest.  The left fighting for a control that they’ll never get and the right doing the same.  The Republicans rejoicing when their candidate wins only to feel the familiar frustrations of disappointment when that candidate fails to accomplish much in Washington; and the same for the Democrats.

We are delusional to think that our current process will somehow get better or magically fix itself when our team wins.  That things will all turn around and be so much better after election day!

It’s completely foolish.  We’ve watched it happen over and over and the result is always the same.  Why are we expecting a different result the next time?

Nothing will get better – nothing – until the people we elect start working like a team.  That is, using their unique skill sets to come up with the best ideas for governance that provide maximum value to the maximum number of people.  Collaborate and compromise, innovate and improve.  No good team works in any other way.  No good parents would have it any other way unless they want messed up kids.  No good company would have it any other way unless they want to go bankrupt.  No good community would have it any other way unless they wanted it to fall apart.  If we align with our spouses on how to raise our kids, if we collaborate and support our co-workers, if we act as good neighbors in our communities, then we have to start demanding that our politicians do the same with their fellow elected officials in office.

When we participate in the partisan game, when we sit in our echo chambers and further push away from our neighbors who are a lot more like us than not, when we elect those whom our favorite news channel tells us to, when we read and listen to only those entities and people who agree with us, then we, ladies and gentlemen are in fact endorsing the dysfunction, approving of the continued ineptitude, and saying “yes” to the demonizing of the “other”…and we end up with exactly what this game guarantees us:

ZERO.

Posted on

Partisanship Is The Problem

Virtually every human condition, tendency, thought, skill, or experience falls neatly onto a bell curve.

Quick example: how many days do you exercise a week? If we ask 10,000 people from around the country then plot out their answers and trace a line through it, the resulting graph will show a bell curve.  Happens with just about everything.  My guess is that maybe 10% of people exercise 0 days, 10% exercise 7 days, and the 80% remaining fall into the 1-6 day range with the curve ballooning out around 2 days.

I don’t have any real data so these are all guesses, but you know what I mean.  Exercise is just a random example but you can extrapolate this out to just about everything we do as human beings – very few of us actually behave/exist on those margins, on those extreme ends of the spectrum.

The big problem is that our politicians do.  Nowadays, that’s the only place they reside – way out there on the margins.  The extremes.  The 10% of us who actually live on the far left and the 10% of us actually on the far right currently have a voice in Washington but what about the 80% of us that don’t always think Republican or Democrat? Why aren’t we represented? We are the actual majority, right?

Or do I have this wrong and politics is different from everything else in the human condition? That we all fall into the Republican camp every time or into the Democratic one every time? Can it be true that we all think this way or we all think that way? That life only has two sides to it?

That’s crazy. 

But as we see every day, Republicans and Democrats always oppose each other.  At least here in 2018 they do.  If a Republican likes it, the Democrat hates it and vice versa.

How is that possible? Don’t the issues we look to our government to manage (e.g. gun control, abortion, infrastructure improvement, tariffs, regulation, energy development, etc.) have many sides to them? Aren’t they more nuanced than yes or no, right or wrong, left or right? If you are for old forms of energy you are automatically against new forms of energy? I can’t believe that the majority of us feel that way yet we see this play out every single time.  Is that the way we really think? 

I don’t believe that.  But I do believe one thing for sure: it’s totally unsustainable.  This yin and yang view of every issue we face cannot go on.  It can’t.  When the way you view a situation is defined by the way the other side views it (i.e. if they like it up, then I like it down) then you will never, ever get anywhere.

When Nazism and white supremacy become partisan, then we’ve lost it.  We’ve gone too far.

Another quick example: people from Michigan hate people from Ohio.  People from Ohio think people from Michigan are idiots.  And vice versa.  I grew up in Michigan and I witnessed this.  It’s a narrative, but is it really true?

Of course not.  Well, I’m sure some people on the margins probably actually believe it, but if you talked to 80% of the people residing in those states if they actually believed it, they’d say no.

So if things don’t actually work like that, what on earth are we doing in these two diametrically opposed political camps?

It seems to me it’s because we have no choice.  We get to vote for this guy, or that guy.  This woman, or that woman.  Trump or Hillary.  No other choice.

Absurd.  We need to get candidates that more closely represent us.  Candidates that will compromise.  Candidates that see the complexity of these issues and legitimately scrutinize the pros and cons of each solution, then decide as a group.  We also need to stop participating in the game.  We need to stop sitting in the red box or the blue box that the echo chambers want us to.  We need to get up and move around.  We need to read more, talk to each other more, understand the issues more.  We need to stop being lazy and reading the crap that tells us our side is great while their side is evil.  We need to stop gorging ourselves on the outrage and scandal and start solving issues in a way that will benefit the majority of us.

Right now all you have is Democratic outrage at every single thing the Republican president does.  If the Democrat had been elected you’d be seeing the exact same thing from the Republicans.

It’s like watching two toddlers fight over a toy.  Why do we put up with it?

Picture for a moment that our government starts to compromise, that politicians of both parties start to work together to come up with the best solutions.  That they put the best ideas on the table and tweak them to benefit the majority of the people – you know, the 80% of us in the middle of that bell curve.  Could you imagine what this country would be like? Could you imagine the well-oiled machine that we’d become, what we could accomplish together? Wouldn’t you love to live in a country like that?

Yeah? Then stand up and demand it.

Posted on

The Time Has Come

It’s time for me to blog.

Blogging has been around for a couple decades now yet I have resisted joining in.  Other than documenting my 2.5 year trip around-the-world on mikethenomad.com, I have not regularly published my thoughts online.  I’m not into social media, not into telling you about every move I make and then awaiting your comments.  I want to write about real things: politics, religion, parenting, racism, guns, travel….life.  I have a lot of experience (I’m 46 as of this writing), seen a few places, done a few things…so it’s time I started writing it down..

I philosophize a lot.  At BBQs in my backyard, at the office, at the dinner table, at the brewery….it seems people find my stories and opinions generally interesting, so why not reach out to a wider audience?

I hope you enjoy it.  I hope it provokes thought.  I hope you disagree.  I hope most of all that we can discuss it, at BBQs, at the office, at the dinner table, at the brewery…as a country we’ve lost our ability to converse, especially with those from the “other” side.

I want to bring it back.  I want my blog to help resurrect the national conversation.  Too lofty? Meh, I’ve got to try.

Michael Kivisto